Nicola sacco trial

Do you have anything else to tell us? Please tell us what you were looking for. Do not include sensitive information, such as Social Security or bank account numbers. Your feedback will not receive a response. Thanks, your message has been sent to Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court! Survey Tell us more about your experience How much do you agree with the following statements in the scale of 1, Strongly Disagree, to 5, Strongly Agree?

Strongly Disagree. This page is helpful. This page is easy to use. Three weeks later, Sacco and Vanzetti were charged with the crime. Many Americans found the evidence against the men flimsy and believed that they were being prosecuted for their immigrant background and their radical political beliefs.

They hold views opposed by the controlling influences of America. It was the height of the post—World War I Red Scare, and the atmosphere was seething with anxieties about Bolshevism, aliens, domestic bombings, and labor unrest. Sacco and Vanzetti trial were convicted of murder on July 14, The committee, which included Abbott Lawrence Lowell, the president of Harvard University, determined that the trial had been fair, and the men were electrocuted on August 23, Mitchell Palmer.

The United States government responded with a series of raids known as the "Palmer Raids" during which thousands of suspected radicals were arrested in over twenty states, including Massachusetts.

Although Sacco and Vanzetti were never implicated in acts of violence, they were Italian immigrants and avowed anarchists. Their trials for armed robbery and murder occurred in this atmosphere of social tension and turmoil. The trial judge permitted the prosecution to present extensive evidence about their anarchist ideology, immigrant background, and refusal to register for the military draft during World War I.

On July 14, , the jury convicted both men. The rules that governed review of trial proceedings contributed to the unfairness of the proceedings. The trial judge had sole authority to decide the defendants' repeated and compelling motions for a new trial. He denied them all.

Appellate rules in effect at the time denied the Supreme Judicial Court the authority to review the strength of the evidence presented at trial. From the s to the present, this case has inspired books, movies, plays, poems, paintings, and music. The photo below, taken on March 9, , was the basis for a famous portrait by artist Ben Shahn.

Filmmaker Peter Miller premiered his documentary about this case in This exhibit is designed to aid the understanding of this crucial episode in American history, and the importance of our striving always to be, in the enduring and inspiring words of the Massachusetts Constitution, "a government of laws and not of men. This form only gathers feedback about the website. Would you like to provide additional feedback to help improve Mass.

How much do you agree with the following statements in the scale of 1, Strongly Disagree, to 5, Strongly Agree? If you would like to continue helping us improve Mass. An official website of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Here's how you know Official websites use.